Hello Union Community,
We are reaching out to share an overview of this semester’s developments with Act 15, the law passed by the Wisconsin state assembly in July 2025. Two components of this statute included language mandating that the Board of Regents develop policies related to 1) the Core Education Requirements/Transfer and 2) Workload Requirements. The statute set the parameters of the policies, but left more complete policy development to the Board of Regents. As you may have already heard, the Board of Regents passed policies related to the Core Education Requirements/Transfer and Workload requirements on November 19th (Board of Regents Meeting Minutes). These policies will now shape our day-to-day work. Here’s a breakdown of how we got here, and what’s next for the union.
Highlights (for those tight on time)
Learn how AFT-WI has been actively resisting Act 15 Core Education Requirements and Workload Requirements. The framework for these policies were embedded in the statute, with some components left to the Board of Regents to more fully develop.
- Act 15 Gen Ed Requirements: The statute required a policy that enabled acceptance of general education courses across the UW system. Under the auspices of this narrow scope, the UW System advanced a standardization of general education requirements across all campuses without faculty input, undermining institutional distinctiveness. All campuses must re-organize their general education requirements within 6 buckets, totaling 36-credits. This far exceeds statute addressing transferability and reshaped curricular aims of campuses without faculty input.
- Workload: The statute also will require a minimum of 24-credit hours to be taught per academic year (see more details below), a workload policy that emphasizes “contact hours” over the full scope of time teaching requires, and demonstrates a limited knowledge of the day-to-day, multi-dimensional work of faculty (research, teaching, and service). It also does not account for differences across disciplines/fields.
- AFT-Wisconsin Resistance: AFT-WI organized a petition, statewide town hall, and model faculty resolutions that our members advanced on every campus. All campuses overwhelmingly supported resolutions opposing Act 15 policies. These strategies mobilized resistance through shared governance, which UW System sees as the core constituent body on curricular issues.
- Done Deal?: Despite the opposition, these policies were cemented by the Board of Regents on November 19, 2025, and approved by the Wisconsin Legislator’s Joint Committee on Employee Relations (JCOER) on December 11, 2025. We see these policies as a part of a larger political project to undermine public higher education and the comprehensive system.
- Next Steps: Come organize us as we continue to build power against Act 15 implementation! Share Updates on Act 15 Implementation: Please share any experiences on Act 15 implementation to ufas223@gmail.com. Join our Work: Join us at our GMMs and events.
Detailed Breakdown Below
- Act 15 Statute: State Statute Creates Policy Parameters
The Core Education Requirements and Transfer component required the Board of Regents to develop a policy that allowed the transfer of credits across all UW system institutions. The statute included a timeline, requiring implementation no later than September 1, 2026, and required the Board of Regents to submit a policy proposal to the Joint Committee on Employment Relations by December 31, 2025. Read Act 15, section 134 for original text.
The Workload component set parameters for teaching load of full-time faculty and instructional academic staff to no fewer than 24 hours per academic year. If the faculty member or instructional member is employed on a 12-month contract, an additional 6 credit hours are required.. The statute includes allowances for reductions in the cases of chairpersons or instructional employees designated as having administrative responsibilities. The statute required that the Board of Regents create a policy for buyouts and other proposed guidelines for exceptions, which were due to the Joint Committee on Employment Relations by December 1, 2025, and subject to approval by January 31, 2026. Read Act 15, section 137 for original text.
- State Policy Climate
The UW System has been the site of numerous attacks that undermine its fundamental educational aims as a public higher education system. Consider the 2023 efforts by Republicans to withhold pre-approved employee raises and building project funding from the UW system until agreement to limit “DEI” courses and initiatives. Additionally, the Senate Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges released a 2021 report, outlining recommendations to reorganize the UW System from 11-comprehensive campuses to a regional approach with increased online options; increased dual enrollment options; and calls to address the “liberal” orientation in higher education by protecting academic freedom of minorities, namely conservative students and faculty. AFT-Wisconsin’s Vice President of Higher Education, political scientist Neil Krause, sees the Gen Education policy as a strategic maneuver to undermine comprehensive campuses via standardization that will likely lead to reductions in course offerings and faculty and staff lines, a part of broader conservative agenda to undermine public higher education and liberal arts education.
- UW System: Working at the Speed of Light
After the passage of the law, UW System President Jay Rothman appointed two workgroups to “operationalize” the policy: the Act 15: Core General Education Requirements and Transfer Work Group and the Act 15: Instructional Employee Teaching Workload Workgroup. See the websites for each work group for details on workgroup members, charge, and archive of updates.
Both workgroups initiated their work in August 2025, which they framed as “operationalizing” the policies within Act 15, and submitting recommended policies to the Board of Regents prior to the November 19th meeting.
Gen Ed Policy: The workgroup’s proposed plan goes far above the statute. Rather than developing a simple policy allowing for ease of transfer, they proposed a narrow plan that creates a 36-credit hour limit within six categories of courses that each university must now organize its general education requirements within. It is worth noting that transfers only make up 2% of the student population, illuminating how the issue of transfers are being utilized to advance a curricular overhaul. For example, you may have heard about the concerns from our comrades and colleagues regarding the extent to which the Ethnic Studies requirement at UW-Madison would survive within this reorganization of the curriculum. And while UW-Madison administrators affirmed that the requirement could be preserved under the “Civics and Perspectives” general education bucket proposed by the work group. See the workgroup policy here.
Workload: The workgroup’s proposed policy outlines teaching minimums according to the UW institution’s research activity designation, resulting in a distinction between Research (R1) Universities (12 credit hours per academic year; 3 additional credits for 12-month employees) and Polytechnic and Comprehensive Universities (24 credit hours per academic year; 6 additional credits for 12-month employees). They developed exceptions for employees with clinical appointments and extension appointments, and allowed for R1 universities to develop instructional equivalency policies that allow faculty to meet the minimum through other activities. It does not consider the substantial amount of work related to teaching that happens outside of “contact hours,” nor does it sufficiently appreciate the various strands of work we engage in (teaching, research, and service). See the workgroup policy here.
- AFT-Wisconsin: Challenges and Resistance to Act 15
AFT-Wisconsin was deeply troubled by Act 15, which many of our members viewed as legislative overreach, and brought a critical lens to the policy’s potentially consequential effects downstream. Our sibling campuses were deeply concerned that the narrowed general education curriculum would undermine institutional distinctiveness (Stephen Point’s emphasis on environmental sustainability), and the narrowed gen ed curriculum as justification for lay offs down the line.
AFT-Wisconsin developed an Act 15 Explainer; held a town hall on October 30th, and circulated a petition to pressure the Board of Regents not to pass the proposed policies of the workgroup.
Leaders from AFT-Wisconsin locals across the UW system met weekly to develop and implement a targeted strategy to pressure the Board of Regents throughout the fall. Given our ongoing 2-year campaign for union recognition, the leaders knew that curriculum matters were considered the domain of shared governance (and not eligible for union input).
Therefore, AFT-Wisconsin developed model resolutions opposing Act 15 and our members organized on their campuses to advance resolutions in their respective faculty senates. By the November 19th Board of Regents meeting, faculty senates at 7 of the 13 campuses successfully passed opposing resolutions against Act 15 (over 90% voted yes, except River Falls, 80%).
Since the November 19th Board of Regents meeting, UW-Madison and UW-Milwaukee have also passed faculty senate resolutions opposing Act 15. The UW-Madison faculty senate passed two resolutions (Resolution Regarding Regents Policy on General Education Requirements and Resolution Reaffirming UW-Madison’s Commitment to the Ethnic Studies Requirement and Shared Governance) crafted by fellow UFAS members, April Haynes and Aireale Rodgers.
- Board of Regents to Wisconsin’s Joint Committee on Employee Relations (JCOER)
Despite resounding opposition from faculty senates across the UW System, on November 19, 2025, the Board of Regents approved the proposed policies of both workgroups, and submitted the policies to Wisconsin’s legislative Joint Committee On Employee Relations (JCOER), which approved the Teaching Workload Policy and reviewed the Core Education requirements.
- Next Steps:
AFT-Wisconsin is committed to following the implementation of these policies, and organizing resistance as (inevitable) issues emerge within our day-to-day work. The speed at which these policies were advanced (July to November 2025) demonstrates the need to build power for whatever may follow.
- Share Updates on Act 15 Implementation: Please share any experiences on Act 15 implementation to ufas223@gmail.com .
- Join our Work: We also welcome folks to join work on our committees: Committee on Political Education (cope@ufas223.org), Organizing (organizing@ufas223.org), Communications, State and System Issues (stateissues@ufas223.org).
- Connect with Community: Join us as a weekly Tuesday Happy Hour at Steenbock’s on Orchard; and join us at our GMMs and events.
We know that our working conditions are our student’s learning conditions. These policy moves, while ostensibly framed as “commonsense,” create a precedent for state legislative overreach in the core academic functions of our work without regard for our expertise and input through shared governance. Even as faculty senate resolutions evidenced resounding opposition, this did not stop the timeline of the policies to overhaul the work that has taken place on each campus to craft a general education program or consider the multi-dimensional work activities of faculty and instructional staff. It raises critical questions about shared governance as an effective venue from which to mount effective resistance.
We are committed to building power. It is critical to build power through other ways beyond shared governance and lobbying organizations. Even as these entities play a critical role in the ecosystem of higher education in Wisconsin, they cannot replace and must exist alongside an entity that is member-led, deliberating as a collective body on what it means to work in higher education in a time such as this. After two years of organizing, union recognition by the Board of Regents for “meet and confer” (6 meetings a semester with campus administrators) appears near, and Act 10 is moving through the courts. These possibilities rebuild the path for collective bargaining and worker power. Come organize with us!
Resources: Catch up on Act 15
- It Seems to Me: ‘Good intentions gone bad’*
- The shady tactics shaping policy in the UW System – Tone Madison*
- UW-Madison faculty blast ‘overreach’ by UW system on transfer credits | Education | captimes.com
- Board of Regents proposes general education requirements across Universities of Wisconsin – The Spectator
- UW system faculty balk at Legislature’s teaching workload requirements | Education | captimes.com
- New UW faculty workload policy could hinder faculty recruitment, professors say — Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
- New UW gen ed policy may ease transfer process. But will it erode campus autonomy? –Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
- Authoritarianism Begins at Home | Minocqua Brewing Company Times
- Ever-expanding AI continues to invade higher education – Tone Madison
- Legislative panel approves new teaching requirements for UW faculty – WPR
- “An Attempt To Dismantle Liberal Arts Curriculum”: Why Union Members Are Concerned About Changes at the University of Wisconsin – Workday Magazine
- Wisconsin public universities could start shedding programs more rapidly | Higher Ed Dive
*Written by union sibling